| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20131030170805.GA25745@google.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:08:05 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: fix invalid list entry warning for double pci
device removing via sysfs
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 06:14:20PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
> When concurent removing pci devices which are in the same pci subtree
> via sysfs, such as:
> echo -n 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:10\:00.0/remove ; echo -n 1 >
> /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:1a\:01.0/remove
> (1a:01.0 device is downstream from the 10:00.0 bridge)
>
> the following warning will show:
> [ 1799.280918] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 1799.336199] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 126 at lib/list_debug.c:53 __list_del_entry+0x63/0xd0()
> [ 1799.433093] list_del corruption, ffff8807b4a7c000->next is LIST_POISON1 (dead000000100100)
> [ 1799.532110] Modules linked in: nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf_conntrack_broadcast ipt_MASQUERADE ip6table_mangle ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat iptable_mangle ipt_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_conntrack nf_conntrack ebtable_filter ebtables ip6table_filter ip6_tables iptable_filter ip_tables sg dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod vfat fat e1000e igb iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support ioatdma ptp i7core_edac ipmi_si edac_core lpc_ich pps_core i2c_i801 pcspkr mfd_core dca ipmi_msghandler acpi_cpufreq xfs libcrc32c sd_mod crc_t10dif crct10dif_common i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper ttm drm mptsas scsi_transport_sas mptscsih i2c_core megaraid_sas mptbase
> [ 1800.276623] CPU: 7 PID: 126 Comm: kworker/u512:1 Tainted: G W 3.12.0-rc5+ #196
> [ 1800.508918] Workqueue: sysfsd sysfs_schedule_callback_work
> [ 1800.574703] 0000000000000009 ffff8807adbadbd8 ffffffff8168b26c ffff8807c27d08a8
> [ 1800.663860] ffff8807adbadc28 ffff8807adbadc18 ffffffff810711dc ffff8807adbadc68
> [ 1800.753130] ffff8807b4a7c000 ffff8807b4a7c000 ffff8807ad089c00 0000000000000000
> [ 1800.842282] Call Trace:
> [ 1800.871651] [<ffffffff8168b26c>] dump_stack+0x55/0x76
> [ 1800.933301] [<ffffffff810711dc>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
> [ 1801.005283] [<ffffffff810712c6>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
> [ 1801.074081] [<ffffffff8135a343>] __list_del_entry+0x63/0xd0
> [ 1801.141839] [<ffffffff8135a3c1>] list_del+0x11/0x40
> [ 1801.201320] [<ffffffff813734da>] pci_remove_bus_device+0x6a/0xe0
> [ 1801.274279] [<ffffffff8137356e>] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0x1e/0x30
> [ 1801.356606] [<ffffffff8137b20b>] remove_callback+0x2b/0x40
> [ 1801.423412] [<ffffffff81251848>] sysfs_schedule_callback_work+0x18/0x60
> [ 1801.503744] [<ffffffff8108eab5>] process_one_work+0x1f5/0x540
> [ 1801.573640] [<ffffffff8108ea53>] ? process_one_work+0x193/0x540
> [ 1801.645616] [<ffffffff8108f2ac>] worker_thread+0x11c/0x370
> [ 1801.712337] [<ffffffff8108f190>] ? rescuer_thread+0x350/0x350
> [ 1801.782178] [<ffffffff8109731d>] kthread+0xed/0x100
> [ 1801.841661] [<ffffffff81097230>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x160/0x160
> [ 1801.919919] [<ffffffff8169cc3c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
> [ 1801.984608] [<ffffffff81097230>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x160/0x160
> [ 1802.062825] ---[ end trace d77f2054de000fb7 ]---
>
> This issue is related to the bug 54411:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54411
>
> Since we added the pci_bus reference management, the bug becomes a
> invalid list entry warning as descripted above. Beacuse it still
> trys to delete an deleted pci device from device list.
>
> So here we make stop device actually detach driver only, and remove
> device will do device_del instead, and move bus_list change and pci device
> resource free into pci_release_dev, so that it'll consistent with
> bus reference managment, and the device only can be deleted from device
> list in pci_release_dev just for one time.
You have a good argument for moving the &dev->bus_list maintenance from
pci_destroy_dev() to pci_release_dev(), because I think we can call
pci_destroy_dev() twice for the same device, and we don't want to do the
list_del() twice.
I suspect we want to move other stuff, too, but you haven't explained
why we need the device_del(), device_release_driver(), and
pci_free_resources() changes. Possibly similar arguments apply. I'd
rather see separate patches to move these pieces so we can think about
them individually.
> Besides, it also makes hostbridge to use device_unregister to be pair
> with device_register before.
Please split the host bridge changes into a separate patch. One logical
change, one patch. If they *can* be split up, please split them up.
> This patch is based on Yinghai's privious similar patch:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/13/658
There are seven patches in that series. I don't know which one you're
referring to.
Please run a spell checker on your changelog. There are many spelling
errors.
> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/pci/remove.c | 32 ++++++++------------------------
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 7ef0f86..c639f44 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1156,6 +1156,21 @@ static void pci_release_capabilities(struct pci_dev *dev)
> pci_free_cap_save_buffers(dev);
> }
>
> +static void pci_free_resources(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + msi_remove_pci_irq_vectors(dev);
> +
> + pci_cleanup_rom(dev);
> + for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_RESOURCES; i++) {
> + struct resource *res = dev->resource + i;
> +
> + if (res->parent)
> + release_resource(res);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /**
> * pci_release_dev - free a pci device structure when all users of it are finished.
> * @dev: device that's been disconnected
> @@ -1165,9 +1180,13 @@ static void pci_release_capabilities(struct pci_dev *dev)
> */
> static void pci_release_dev(struct device *dev)
> {
> - struct pci_dev *pci_dev;
> + struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +
> + down_write(&pci_bus_sem);
> + list_del(&pci_dev->bus_list);
> + up_write(&pci_bus_sem);
> + pci_free_resources(pci_dev);
>
> - pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> pci_release_capabilities(pci_dev);
> pci_release_of_node(pci_dev);
> pcibios_release_device(pci_dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/remove.c b/drivers/pci/remove.c
> index 8fc54b7..5659283 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/remove.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/remove.c
> @@ -3,20 +3,6 @@
> #include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
> #include "pci.h"
>
> -static void pci_free_resources(struct pci_dev *dev)
> -{
> - int i;
> -
> - msi_remove_pci_irq_vectors(dev);
> -
> - pci_cleanup_rom(dev);
> - for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_RESOURCES; i++) {
> - struct resource *res = dev->resource + i;
> - if (res->parent)
> - release_resource(res);
> - }
> -}
> -
> static void pci_stop_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> pci_pme_active(dev, false);
> @@ -24,8 +10,7 @@ static void pci_stop_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
> if (dev->is_added) {
> pci_proc_detach_device(dev);
> pci_remove_sysfs_dev_files(dev);
> - device_del(&dev->dev);
> - dev->is_added = 0;
> + device_release_driver(&dev->dev);
> }
>
> if (dev->bus->self)
> @@ -34,12 +19,11 @@ static void pci_stop_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
>
> static void pci_destroy_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> - down_write(&pci_bus_sem);
> - list_del(&dev->bus_list);
> - up_write(&pci_bus_sem);
> -
> - pci_free_resources(dev);
> - put_device(&dev->dev);
> + if (dev->is_added) {
> + device_del(&dev->dev);
> + put_device(&dev->dev);
> + dev->is_added = 0;
This is wrong. You can't reference dev->is_added after put_device()
because you have to assume you are holding the only reference, and the
pci_dev may be deallocated before put_device() returns.
> + }
> }
>
> void pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> @@ -126,7 +110,7 @@ void pci_stop_root_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> pci_stop_bus_device(child);
>
> /* stop the host bridge */
> - device_del(&host_bridge->dev);
> + device_release_driver(&host_bridge->dev);
> }
>
> void pci_remove_root_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> @@ -145,5 +129,5 @@ void pci_remove_root_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> host_bridge->bus = NULL;
>
> /* remove the host bridge */
> - put_device(&host_bridge->dev);
> + device_unregister(&host_bridge->dev);
> }
> --
> 1.8.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists