[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201310302035.36579.PeterHuewe@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:35:36 +0100
From: Peter Hüwe <PeterHuewe@....de>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc: Ashley Lai <ashley@...leylai.com>, Rajiv Andrade <mail@...jiv.net>,
Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Xiaoyan Zhang <xiaoyan.zhang@...el.com>,
Gang Wei <gang.wei@...el.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm/tpm_ppi: Do not compare strcmp(a,b) == -1
Hi Joe, Jason
> fyi: using
> if (strcmp(foo, bar) < 0)
> is canonical.
Yeah of course you're both right -
if (strcmp(foo, bar) < 0)
is the correct version.
Sorry about the rubbish patch.
> lib/string.c:strcmp returns only -1,0,1
> so that's what the arch versions should do too.
> However, arch implementations do vary...
Joe, You are right on this one as well.
I did not pay attention to where cscope did send me
- it was arch/x86/boot/string.c which implements it as
while (*s1 || *s2) {
delta = *s2 - *s1;
if (delta)
return delta;
s1++;
s2++;
}
Although I know that this is not used here,
it differs from the version in lib. (Maybe worth changing?)
In anycase
if (strcmp(foo, bar) < 0)
is better than
if (strcmp(foo, bar) == -1)
so I'll resend the patch.
Thanks for reviewing!
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists