lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:30:09 +0100
From:	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
To:	Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>
Cc:	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] backlight: atmel-pwm-bl: use gpio_request_one

On 14:20 Tue 29 Oct     , Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:15:43PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 11:55 Wed 23 Oct     , Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > Use devm_gpio_request_one rather than requesting and setting direction
> > > in two calls.
> > 
> > this is the same I do not see any advantage
> 
> It removes one error path.
> 
> > and as I said for ather backligth It's wrong to enable or disable it at probe
> > as the bootloader might have already enable it for splash screen
> 
> I agree with you on that, and it's actually the reason for the below
> clean up. I use a second patch:
> 
>         if (gpio_is_valid(pwmbl->gpio_on)) {
> -               /* Turn display off by default. */
> -               if (pdata->on_active_low)
> +               /* Turn display off unless already enabled. */
> +               if (pdata->gpio_on_enabled ^ pdata->on_active_low)
>                         flags = GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH;
>                 else
>                         flags = GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW;
> 
> to make sure the driver does not temporarily disable the backlight at
> probe.
> 
> Decided not to submit it as part of this series when I realised that
> several other backlight drivers did the same, but perhaps I should?

I'm not happy with this idea to play with enable at probe time

we need to detect the current status if possible and only enable or disable
when requiered

Best Regards,
J.
> 
> Thanks,
> Johan
> 
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>:w
> > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/video/backlight/atmel-pwm-bl.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/atmel-pwm-bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/atmel-pwm-bl.c
> > > index 1277e0c..5ea2517 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/atmel-pwm-bl.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/atmel-pwm-bl.c
> > > @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ static int atmel_pwm_bl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	const struct atmel_pwm_bl_platform_data *pdata;
> > >  	struct backlight_device *bldev;
> > >  	struct atmel_pwm_bl *pwmbl;
> > > +	int flags;
> > >  	int retval;
> > >  
> > >  	pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > > @@ -149,14 +150,14 @@ static int atmel_pwm_bl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  		return retval;
> > >  
> > >  	if (gpio_is_valid(pwmbl->gpio_on)) {
> > > -		retval = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pwmbl->gpio_on,
> > > -					"gpio_atmel_pwm_bl");
> > > -		if (retval)
> > > -			goto err_free_pwm;
> > > -
> > >  		/* Turn display off by default. */
> > > -		retval = gpio_direction_output(pwmbl->gpio_on,
> > > -				0 ^ pdata->on_active_low);
> > > +		if (pdata->on_active_low)
> > > +			flags = GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH;
> > > +		else
> > > +			flags = GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW;
> > > +
> > > +		retval = devm_gpio_request_one(&pdev->dev, pwmbl->gpio_on,
> > > +						flags, "gpio_atmel_pwm_bl");
> > >  		if (retval)
> > >  			goto err_free_pwm;
> > >  	}
> > > -- 
> > > 1.8.4
> > > 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ