linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: add msm bam dma driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5271701C.3010706@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:46:20 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>
CC:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: add msm bam dma driver

On 10/30/13 13:31, Andy Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:56:03AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 10/25, Andy Gross wrote:
>>> +#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
>>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of_dma.h>
>>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>>> +#include <linux/msm_bam_dma.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include "dmaengine.h"
>>> +#include "msm_bam_dma_priv.h"
>> Why do we need this file? Can't we just put the #defines in this
>> file?
>  
> There were enough definitions and structures to warrant another file.
>

Ah ok. I find it annoying to flip between two files but I guess that's
my problem.

>>> +	if (!bdev) {
>>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "insufficient memory for private data\n");
>> kmalloc calls already print errors when they fail, so this can be
>> removed.
>  
> has this always been the case?

The warning in the page allocator seems to have been there since pre-git
days (see __alloc_pages_slowpath() and how it calls warn_alloc_failed())
. Other warnings in the sl*b allocators seem to have come later (see
8bdec192b40cf7f7eec170b317c76089eb5eeddb for example).

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/