[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd-V21vyFatz0LmKThXoXxKkYgK9JB8HvtKeNhXQQ8rN5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:34:29 +0900
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.sahrawat@...sung.com,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] fat: add i_disksize to represent uninitialized size
2013/10/30, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>:
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> writes:
>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/fat/cache.c b/fs/fat/cache.c
>>>> index 91ad9e1..37572c2 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/fat/cache.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/fat/cache.c
>>>> @@ -329,10 +329,10 @@ int fat_bmap(struct inode *inode, sector_t
>>>> sector,
>>>> sector_t *phys,
>>>> return 0;
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> - * ->mmu_private can access on only allocation path.
>>>> + * ->i_disksize can access on only allocation path.
>>>> * (caller must hold ->i_mutex)
>>>> */
>>>> - last_block = (MSDOS_I(inode)->mmu_private + (blocksize - 1))
>>>> + last_block = (MSDOS_I(inode)->i_disksize + (blocksize - 1))
>>>> >> blocksize_bits;
>>>> if (sector >= last_block)
>>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> Hm, bmap() ioctl returns between ->mmu_private and i_disksize? I'm not
>>> checking other FSes what does...
>> I added this code after checking such behaviour from ext4.
>
> OK. I will check with it. BTW, comment should say the both
> (i.e. ->mmu_private and ->i_disksize must under ->i_mutex).
Okay, I will update.
Thanks!
> --
> OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists