[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5271B012.4060200@atmel.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:19:14 +0800
From: Bo Shen <voice.shen@...el.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] misc: atmel_pwm: set initcall level to subsys
Hi Arnd,
On 10/31/2013 04:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 October 2013, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> I really hate this type of patch, as it's papering over the real
>>> problem. What happens when someone else moves their driver to this
>>> level? Then you are back to the original problem.
>>
>> Yes, it's crude, but it's currently the only way to express a preferred
>> probe order.
>
> Does the same problem occur with the generic PWM subsystem?
>
> The atmel_pwm driver apparently is the last PWM driver that has
> not been converted to the generic subsystem yet. Doing that would
> also let us drop the atmel-pwm-bl driver in favor of the generic
> backlight.
The atmel pwm driver is on the way to generic subsystem. more
information at:
--->8---
PWM: atmel-pwm: add PWM controller driver:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2963081/
---<8---
Best Regards,
Bo Shen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists