linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] perf/x86: add Intel RAPL PMU support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:14:23 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, ak@...ux.intel.com,
	acme@...hat.com, jolsa@...hat.com, zheng.z.yan@...el.com,
	bp@...en8.de, maria.n.dimakopoulou@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] perf/x86: add Intel RAPL PMU support

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:59:41PM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> +/*
> + * we compute in 0.23 nJ increments regardless of MSR

We don't in fact use 0.23 nJ, we use 2^-32 J.

> + */
> +EVENT_ATTR_STR(energy-cores.scale, rapl_cores_scale, "2.3e-10");
> +EVENT_ATTR_STR(energy-pkg.scale, rapl_pkg_scale, "2.3e-10");
> +EVENT_ATTR_STR(energy-ram.scale, rapl_ram_scale, "2.3e-10");

Am I weird for proposing we use:

  "2.3283064365386962890625e-10"

instead? Its not like anybody needs to go type this by hand.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/