[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F31D52E99@ORSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:24:56 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>, Madper Xie <cxie@...hat.com>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"ccross@...roid.com" <ccross@...roid.com>,
"anton@...msg.org" <anton@...msg.org>
CC: "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"bbboson@...il.com" <bbboson@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] make all stored entries accessible.
> So, do you mean efivars should fix to use the "id" in a proper way?
It would avoid the need for all these tests, and additions to the filename to guarantee
uniqueness.
Not sure what options efivars has to create a unique, persistent "id" for each
record. It's a fundamental part of how ERST works (though the unique ID is just
based around a timestamp).
> I acked Madper's patch 2/2 earlier today, but when I look at your test result, I'm not sure if
> it is reasonable for users to make multiple numbers visible to the file name.
>
>> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 17499 Oct 30 13:41 dmesg-erst-5940651313304961029--2129078373-1383165669
after I added the "count = 0" initialization the filename gets a tiny bit less
scary:
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 17499 Oct 30 13:41 dmesg-erst-5940651313304961029-0-1383165669
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists