[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52729BCB.1000700@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:04:59 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 31 (input & leds)
On 10/31/13 03:00, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20131030:
>
> The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
>
> The devicetree tree gained a conflict against the crypto tree.
>
> The tty tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> next-20131030.
>
> The arm-soc tree gained conflicts against the devicetree tree.
on i386, when both
CONFIG_INPUT=m
CONFIG_INPUT_LEDS=m
ERROR: "input_led_disconnect" [drivers/input/input-core.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "input_led_connect" [drivers/input/input-core.ko] undefined!
Full randconfig file is attached.
--
~Randy
View attachment "config-r5081" of type "text/plain" (85504 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists