[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5272AA80.1030804@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:07:44 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
CC: mturquette@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, jiada_wang@...tor.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/5] clk: Implement clk_unregister()
On 10/31/2013 12:55 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 31/10/13 19:32, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 10/29/2013 01:51 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>>>> clk_unregister() is currently not implemented and it is required when
>>>> a clock provider module needs to be unloaded.
>>>>
>>>> Normally the clock supplier module is prevented to be unloaded by
>>>> taking reference on the module in clk_get().
>>>>
>>>> For cases when the clock supplier module deinitializes despite the
>>>> consumers of its clocks holding a reference on the module, e.g. when
>>>> the driver is unbound through "unbind" sysfs attribute, there are
>>>> empty clock ops added. These ops are assigned temporarily to struct
>>>> clk and used until all consumers release the clock, to avoid invoking
>>>> callbacks from the module which just got removed.
>>
>> This patch is now in Mike's clk-next and hence next-20131031, and causes
>> both a WARN and an OOPS when booting the Tegra Dalmore board. (See log
>> below)
>>
>> If I do the following to fix some other issues:
>>
>> 1) Apply:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg283619.html
>> clk: fix boot panic with non-dev-associated clocks
>>
>> 2) Merge some Tegra-specific bug-fixes:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/29/771
>> Re: pull request for Tegra clock rework and Tegra124 clock support
>>
>> ... then revert this patch a336ed7 "clk: Implement clk_unregister()",
>> everything works again.
>
> Does it still crash when you apply this patch
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg283550.html ?
Yes, that seems to work, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists