linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: msm: Remove 7x00 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131031192330.GG16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:23:30 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
Cc:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: msm: Remove 7x00 support

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:35:06AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> ARM and the sub-architectures is already confusing I don't think we need
> to start compounding the problem by allowing random whatever-you-want
> sub-directories from every sub-architecture.

Confusing?

I'm not sure about that.  It's actually really simple from my perspective:

arch/arm - the ARM 32-bit architecture

arch/arm/mach-* - support for a single SoC or a group of similar SoCs

arch/arm/plat-* - common support for a set of dissimilar SoCs which want
	to share code between themselves

How is that confusing?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/