[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131031194346.GC31722@fifo99.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:43:46 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: msm: Remove 7x00 support
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 07:23:30PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:35:06AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > ARM and the sub-architectures is already confusing I don't think we need
> > to start compounding the problem by allowing random whatever-you-want
> > sub-directories from every sub-architecture.
>
> Confusing?
>
> I'm not sure about that. It's actually really simple from my perspective:
>
> arch/arm - the ARM 32-bit architecture
>
> arch/arm/mach-* - support for a single SoC or a group of similar SoCs
>
> arch/arm/plat-* - common support for a set of dissimilar SoCs which want
> to share code between themselves
>
> How is that confusing?
>
It's the relationship between the arch/arm/mach-* and the
arch/arm/plat-* and which ones connect with each other etc, and how the
connection was actually done..
For me as a developer I found it confusing vs something that was fully integrated.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists