lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 1 Nov 2013 18:00:20 +0900
From:	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: get rid of unnecessary pageblock scanning in setup_zone_migrate_reserve

Hi Mel and Kosaki,

Thank you for posting patches.

I tested your patches. And following table shows time of onlining
a memory section.

Amount of memory        | 128GB | 192GB | 256GB|
------------------------------------------------
linux-3.12-rc7          |  24.3 |  30.2 | 45.6 |
Kosaki's first patch    |   8.3 |   8.3 |  8.6 |
Mel + Kosaki's nit pick |  10.9 |  19.2 | 31.3 |
------------------------------------------------
                                    (millisecond)

128GB : 4 nodes and each node has 32GB of memory
192GB : 6 nodes and each node has 32GB of memory
256GB : 8 nodes and each node has 32GB of memory

In my result, Mel's patch does not seem to fix the problem since time
is increasing with increasing amount of memory.

Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu

(2013/11/01 2:14), KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>> Nit. I would like to add following hunk. This is just nit because moving
>>> reserve pageblock is extreme rare.
>>>
>>>         if (block_migratetype == MIGRATE_RESERVE) {
>>> +                       found++;
>>>             set_pageblock_migratetype(page, MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
>>>             move_freepages_block(zone, page, MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
>>>         }
>>
>> I don't really see the advantage but if you think it is necessary then I
>> do not object either.
>
> For example, a zone has five pageblock b1,b2,b3,b4,b5 and b1 has MIGRATE_RESERVE.
> When hotremove b1 and hotadd again, your code need to scan all of blocks. But
> mine only need to scan b1 and b2. I mean that's a hotplug specific optimization.
>
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ