linux-kernel - [PATCH V3 09/11] perf test: Update "sample parsing" test for PERF_SAMPLE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1383313899-15987-10-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Date:	Fri,  1 Nov 2013 15:51:37 +0200
From:	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3 09/11] perf test: Update "sample parsing" test for PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION

In fact the "sample parsing" test does not automatically
check new sample type bits - they must be added to the
comparison logic.  Doing that shows that the test fails
because the functions perf_event__synthesize_sample()
and perf_event__sample_event_size() have not been
updated with PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION either.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
index 61c9da2..1b67720 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
@@ -121,6 +121,9 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1,
 	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC)
 		COMP(data_src);
 
+	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION)
+		COMP(transaction);
+
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -165,6 +168,7 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs_user, u64 read_format)
 		.cpu		= 110,
 		.raw_size	= sizeof(raw_data),
 		.data_src	= 111,
+		.transaction	= 112,
 		.raw_data	= (void *)raw_data,
 		.callchain	= &callchain.callchain,
 		.branch_stack	= &branch_stack.branch_stack,
@@ -273,7 +277,8 @@ int test__sample_parsing(void)
 
 	/*
 	 * Fail the test if it has not been updated when new sample format bits
-	 * were added.
+	 * were added.  Please actually update the test rather than just change
+	 * the condition below.
 	 */
 	if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION << 1) {
 		pr_debug("sample format has changed, some new PERF_SAMPLE_ bit was introduced - test needs updating\n");
-- 
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/