[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87iowcc1id.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:43:46 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, mwdalton@...gle.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] virtio-net: coalesce rx frags when possible during rx
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> writes:
> Commit 2613af0ed18a11d5c566a81f9a6510b73180660a (virtio_net: migrate mergeable
> rx buffers to page frag allocators) try to increase the payload/truesize for
> MTU-sized traffic. But this will introduce the extra overhead for GSO packets
> received because of the frag list. This commit tries to reduce this issue by
> coalesce the possible rx frags when possible during rx. Test result shows the
> about 15% improvement on full size GSO packet receiving (and even better than
> commit 2613af0ed18a11d5c566a81f9a6510b73180660a).
I don't know about the other users of skb_add_rx_frag, but should
this coalesce-if-possible code be built into that?
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists