[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5273BA58.6010404@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:27:36 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, mingo@...nel.org, prarit@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] fix race between stop_two_cpus and stop_cpus
On 11/01/2013 10:24 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 01:44:24PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
>> Ok, I see your point now but still wonder if this is too specialised
>> for what we are trying to do. Could it have been done with a read-write
>> semaphore with the global stop_cpus taking it for write and stop_two_cpus
>> taking it for read?
>
> rwsem for read is still global state.. That said it should be fairly
> easy to use lglock for this.
I'll rewrite the patch using lglocks, that should make things
more readable.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists