lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5273BA58.6010404@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:27:36 -0400
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, mingo@...nel.org, prarit@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] fix race between stop_two_cpus and stop_cpus

On 11/01/2013 10:24 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 01:44:24PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
>> Ok, I see your point now but still wonder if this is too specialised
>> for what we are trying to do.  Could it have been done with a read-write
>> semaphore with the global stop_cpus taking it for write and stop_two_cpus
>> taking it for read?
> 
> rwsem for read is still global state.. That said it should be fairly
> easy to use lglock for this.

I'll rewrite the patch using lglocks, that should make things
more readable.

-- 
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ