lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 1 Nov 2013 14:29:18 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
	Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

Hi Jens,

Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in
fs/f2fs/segment.c between commit cc7b1bb17367 ("f2fs: avoid allocating
failure in bio_alloc") from the f2fs tree and commit ed2d2f9a8265
("block: Abstract out bvec iterator") from the block tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --cc fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 3d4d5fc19e6f,9d77ce168676..000000000000
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@@ -675,9 -676,8 +675,9 @@@ retry
  			goto retry;
  		}
  
 -		sbi->bio[type] = f2fs_bio_alloc(bdev, max_hw_blocks(sbi));
 +		bio_blocks = MAX_BIO_BLOCKS(max_hw_blocks(sbi));
 +		sbi->bio[type] = f2fs_bio_alloc(bdev, bio_blocks);
- 		sbi->bio[type]->bi_sector = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(sbi, blk_addr);
+ 		sbi->bio[type]->bi_iter.bi_sector = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(sbi, blk_addr);
  		sbi->bio[type]->bi_private = priv;
  		/*
  		 * The end_io will be assigned at the sumbission phase.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ