[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1383326384.6788.49.camel@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:19:44 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Tibor Billes <tbilles@....com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: rcu: Throttle rcu_try_advance_all_cbs() execution causes visible
slowdown in ftrace switching
Hi,
I am doing some clean up in x86 ftrace code. I check the performance by
switching between different tracers and by enabling and disabling them.
The operation has started to be much slower after rebasing on the
kernel tip tree. Bisecting has shown that the difference was caused by
the commit c229828ca6bc62d6c654 (rcu: Throttle
rcu_try_advance_all_cbs() execution)
The following times are from Intel 2xCore i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz when
calling the attached test script (time ./test-ftrace). It 100x switches
between "function" and "nop" tracer. It also enables and disables the
tracer each time.
Results with the commit c229828ca6bc62d6c654:
real 0m49.393s 0m49.632s 0m49.359s
user 0m0.004s 0m0.000s 0m0.004s
sys 0m0.996s 0m0.880s 0m0.892s
Results after reverting the commit c229828ca6bc62d6c654:
real 0m35.320s 0m35.687s 0m35.920s
user 0m0.004s 0m0.004s 0m0.000s
sys 0m1.140s 0m1.208s 0m1.152s
I might do some more debugging on Monday. I wonder if you have any
hints or ideas.
Best Regards,
Petr
Download attachment "test-ftrace" of type "application/x-shellscript" (319 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists