[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131101173701.GC8467@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 13:37:01 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Run checksumming in parallel accross multiple alu's
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 04:18:50PM -0000, David Laight wrote:
> > How would you suggest replacing the jumps in this case? I agree it would be
> > faster here, but I'm not sure how I would implement an increment using a single
> > conditional move.
>
> I think you need 3 instructions, move a 0, conditionally move a 1
> then add. I suspect it won't be a win!
>
> If you do 'win' it is probably very dependent on how the instructions
> get scheduled onto the execution units - which will probably make
> it very cpu type dependant.
>
> David
>
I agree, that sounds interesting, but very cpu dependent. Thanks for the
suggestion, Ben, but I think it would be better if we just did the prefetch here
and re-addressed this area when AVX (or addcx/addox) instructions were available
for testing on hardware.
Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists