[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1383338001.28909.42.camel@pasglop>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 07:33:21 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Strange location and name for platform devices when
device-tree is used.
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 11:04 -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> There are two problems here. First, making the change moves all the DT
> populated devices under the /sys/devices/platform tree, not just
> platform devices.
All DT populated *platform* devices. There are others that have their
own locations.
> Second, I expect there is going to be userspace breakage to move them.
> I've considered moving them before, but so far have felt that being
> tidier hasn't been worth the potential breakage. Userspace /shouldn't/
> be relying on the node name, but we all know that userspace always does
> what it should, right?
>
> That said, I'm mostly concerned about breakage on Power machines, not on
> the ARM devices in this regard. If you are convinced that I'm worrying about
> nothing, then I'm fine with making the change. If anyone complains
> however then it will need to be reverted.
I don't see an issue with power.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists