linux-kernel - [ 28/32] writeback: fix negative bdi max pause

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri,  1 Nov 2013 14:43:39 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [ 28/32] writeback: fix negative bdi max pause

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>

commit e3b6c655b91e01a1dade056cfa358581b47a5351 upstream.

Toralf runs trinity on UML/i386.  After some time it hangs and the last
message line is

	BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [trinity-child0:1521]

It's found that pages_dirtied becomes very large.  More than 1000000000
pages in this case:

	period = HZ * pages_dirtied / task_ratelimit;
	BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 2000000000);
	BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 1000000000);      <---------

UML debug printf shows that we got negative pause here:

	ick: pause : -984
	ick: pages_dirtied : 0
	ick: task_ratelimit: 0

	 pause:
	+       if (pause < 0)  {
	+               extern int printf(char *, ...);
	+               printf("ick : pause : %li\n", pause);
	+               printf("ick: pages_dirtied : %lu\n", pages_dirtied);
	+               printf("ick: task_ratelimit: %lu\n", task_ratelimit);
	+               BUG_ON(1);
	+       }
	        trace_balance_dirty_pages(bdi,

Since pause is bounded by [min_pause, max_pause] where min_pause is also
bounded by max_pause.  It's suspected and demonstrated that the
max_pause calculation goes wrong:

	ick: pause : -717
	ick: min_pause : -177
	ick: max_pause : -717
	ick: pages_dirtied : 14
	ick: task_ratelimit: 0

The problem lies in the two "long = unsigned long" assignments in
bdi_max_pause() which might go negative if the highest bit is 1, and the
min_t(long, ...) check failed to protect it falling under 0.  Fix all of
them by using "unsigned long" throughout the function.

Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Reported-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>
Tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 mm/page-writeback.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -1072,11 +1072,11 @@ static unsigned long dirty_poll_interval
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static long bdi_max_pause(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
-			  unsigned long bdi_dirty)
+static unsigned long bdi_max_pause(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
+				   unsigned long bdi_dirty)
 {
-	long bw = bdi->avg_write_bandwidth;
-	long t;
+	unsigned long bw = bdi->avg_write_bandwidth;
+	unsigned long t;
 
 	/*
 	 * Limit pause time for small memory systems. If sleeping for too long
@@ -1088,7 +1088,7 @@ static long bdi_max_pause(struct backing
 	t = bdi_dirty / (1 + bw / roundup_pow_of_two(1 + HZ / 8));
 	t++;
 
-	return min_t(long, t, MAX_PAUSE);
+	return min_t(unsigned long, t, MAX_PAUSE);
 }
 
 static long bdi_min_pause(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/