linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] perf timechart: use proc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <874n7w64fe.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date:	Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:07:17 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...dex-team.ru>
Cc:	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	acme@...stprotocols.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] perf timechart: use proc_num to implement --power-only

On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:28:46 +0400, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>> I don't see how it does same thing.  You mean it by skipping
>> draw_process_bars() and draw_wakeups() on patch 1?  It'd be better
>> changelog explains the details.
> Yes, it depends on the previous patch, I'll add more info to the
> changelog.

If so, I think it'd better moving the if () parts into this patch.

Thanks,
Namhyung

>
>> And I'd like to keep it as BOOLEAN option - it's simpler and more
>> straight-forward IMHO.
>> 
>> How about adding
>> 
>> 	if (power_only)
>> 		proc_num = 0;
>> 
>> after parsing the command line options?
> Ok, this works too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/