linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dt-rh tree with the powerpc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1383347586.4776.0.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Sat, 02 Nov 2013 10:13:06 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dt-rh tree with the powerpc tree

On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 17:24 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 11/01/2013 12:20 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the dt-rh tree got a conflict in 
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/prom.h between commit a3e31b458844 ("of:
> > Move definition of of_find_next_cache_node into common code") from
> > the powerpc tree and commit 0c3f061c195c ("of: implement
> > of_node_to_nid as a weak function") from the dt-rh tree.
> 
> Ben, I can pick these 2 patches up instead if you want to drop them
> and avoid the conflict.

I'd rather not rebase my tree, the conflict seems to be rather trivial
to solve.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/