[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131101173003.e0c6ce3749c3b6b1dd0c109e@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 17:30:03 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the leds tree with the powerpc tree
Hi Bryan,
Today's linux-next merge of the leds tree got a conflict in
include/linux/of.h between commit a3e31b458844 ("of: Move definition of
of_find_next_cache_node into common code") from the powerpc tree and
commit 954e04b9491a ("of: introduce of_get_available_child_count") from
the leds tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc include/linux/of.h
index 2567ccd32482,54c25606a997..000000000000
--- a/include/linux/of.h
+++ b/include/linux/of.h
@@@ -228,8 -226,17 +228,19 @@@ static inline int of_get_child_count(co
return num;
}
+ static inline int of_get_available_child_count(const struct device_node *np)
+ {
+ struct device_node *child;
+ int num = 0;
+
+ for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child)
+ num++;
+
+ return num;
+ }
+
+/* cache lookup */
+extern struct device_node *of_find_next_cache_node(const struct device_node *);
extern struct device_node *of_find_node_with_property(
struct device_node *from, const char *prop_name);
#define for_each_node_with_property(dn, prop_name) \
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists