linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/32] 3.4.68-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131102022854.GA20224@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Fri, 1 Nov 2013 19:28:54 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ 00/32] 3.4.68-stable review

On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:43:11PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.68 release.
> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun Nov  3 21:41:40 UTC 2013.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.68-rc1.gz
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
Looks like PATCH in the headline got lost.

Test results look good:
	total: 103 pass: 89 skipped: 10 fail: 4

qemu tests all pass. 

The result matches results seen with the previous release.

Details are at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.

Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/