linux-kernel - Re: zram/zsmalloc issues in very low memory conditions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5274688D.7050902@oracle.com>
Date:	Sat, 02 Nov 2013 10:50:53 +0800
From:	Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>
To:	Olav Haugan <ohaugan@...eaurora.org>
CC:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: zram/zsmalloc issues in very low memory conditions

Hi Olav,

On 11/02/2013 08:59 AM, Olav Haugan wrote:

> 
> I tried the above suggestion but it does not seem to have any noticeable
> impact. The system is still trying to swap out at a very high rate after
> zram reported failure to swap out. The error logging is actually so much
> that my system crashed due to excessive logging (we have a watchdog that
> is not getting pet because the kernel is busy logging kernel messages).
> 

I have a question that why the low memory killer didn't get triggered in
this situation?
Is it possible to set the LMK a bit more aggressive?

> There isn't anything that can be set to tell the fs layer to back off
> completely for a while (congestion control)?
> 

The other way I think might fix your issue is the same as your mentioned
in your previous email.
Set the congested bit for swap device also.
Like:

diff --git a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
index 91d94b5..c4fc63e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -474,6 +474,7 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct
bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
        if (!handle) {
                pr_info("Error allocating memory for compressed page:
%u, size=%zu\n",
                        index, clen);
+               blk_set_queue_congested(zram->disk->queue, BLK_RW_ASYNC);
                ret = -ENOMEM;
                goto out;
        }
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 8ed1b77..1c790ee 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -394,8 +394,6 @@ static inline int is_page_cache_freeable(struct page
*page)
 static int may_write_to_queue(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
                              struct scan_control *sc)
 {
-       if (current->flags & PF_SWAPWRITE)
-               return 1;

--------------------------------------------------------------

For the update of the congested state of zram, I think you can clear it
from use space eg. after LMK triggered and reclaimed some memory.

Of course this depends on zram driver to export a sysfs node like
"/sys/block/zram0/clear_congested".

-- 
Regards,
-Bob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/