linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] bnx2: Use dev_kfree_skb_any() in bnx2_tx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131102.010642.1846904926665537525.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 02 Nov 2013 01:06:42 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc:	xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, mchan@...adcom.com,
	tdmackey@...leanhaiku.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2: Use dev_kfree_skb_any() in bnx2_tx_int()

From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 23:34:50 +0000

> As you've said, the ndo_start_xmit and NAPI poll operations are intended
> to be called in softirq context, so everything that interlocks with them
> will use spin_lock_bh().  Calling them from hardirq context obviously
> opens the possibility of a deadlock.  How do you expect anyone to solve
> that?

That's not what I said.

I did not say that it must be invoked in softirq context.

I said that it MUST LOOK like it is being invoked in softirq
context as far as the ->poll() code paths can tell.

But yes, that's hard.

The thing is, ->poll() is atomic.  You never will have poll calls
recurse into eachother.  This is why we strongly encourage all driver
authors to make their ->poll() implementations lockless.

And, wouldn't you know it, tg3 is a driver that does this
properly.

Therefore, there are no netpoll no locking problems, because the poll
implementation takes no locks and therefore doesn't care.

That's why tg3 doesn't have any of these netpoll issues.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/