[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131103202037.GA2785@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 21:20:37 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Hyeoncheol Lee <cheol.lee@....com>,
Hemant Kumar <hkshaw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] tracing/uprobes: Fetch args before reserving a
ring buffer
On 11/01, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Ah, please ignore... handler_chain() is not self-serialized, so
> tu->buffer needs locking/waiting too.
Still I have to admit that I strongly dislike this yet another
(and imho strange) memory pool. However, I am not going to argue
because I can't suggest something better right now.
But. Perhaps it makes sense to at least add a couple of trivial
helpers in 10/13? Something like arg_buf_get/put/init, just to
simplify the potential changes.
Also. I think we should not use this pool unconditionally but
again, this is another improvement we can do later.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists