[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1383563382-8535-5-git-send-email-swhiteho@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:09:27 +0000
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
To: cluster-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/19] GFS2: Do not reset flags on active reservations
From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>
When we used try locks for rgrps on block allocations, it was important
to clear the flags field so that we used a blocking hold on the glock.
Now that we're not doing try locks, clearing flags is unnecessary, and
a waste of time. In fact, it's probably doing the wrong thing because
it clears the GL_SKIP bit that was set for the lvb tracking purposes.
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
index 7d64a27..8e50038 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
@@ -1825,7 +1825,6 @@ int gfs2_inplace_reserve(struct gfs2_inode *ip, u32 requested, u32 aflags)
return -EINVAL;
if (gfs2_rs_active(rs)) {
begin = rs->rs_rbm.rgd;
- flags = 0; /* Yoda: Do or do not. There is no try */
} else if (ip->i_rgd && rgrp_contains_block(ip->i_rgd, ip->i_goal)) {
rs->rs_rbm.rgd = begin = ip->i_rgd;
} else {
--
1.7.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists