[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131104170413.GA25764@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 17:04:13 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Don Morris <don.morris@...com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#8 stuck for 22s!
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 01:29:22PM -0400, Don Morris wrote:
> Greetings, all.
>
> Just wanted to drop this out there to see if it rang any bells.
> I've been getting a soft lockup (numad thread stuck on a cpu
> while attempting to attach a task to a cgroup) for a while now,
> but I thought it was only happening when I applied Mel Gorman's
> set of AutoNUMA patches.
This maybe?
---8<---
mm: memcontrol: Release css_set_lock when aborting an OOM scan
css_task_iter_start acquires the css_set_lock and it must be released with
a call to css_task_iter_end. Commmit 9cbb78bb (mm, memcg: introduce own
oom handler to iterate only over its own threads) introduced a loop that
was not guaranteed to call css_task_iter_end.
Cc: stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 5ef8929..941f67d 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1795,6 +1795,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
mem_cgroup_iter_break(memcg, iter);
if (chosen)
put_task_struct(chosen);
+ css_task_iter_end(&it);
return;
case OOM_SCAN_OK:
break;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists