linux-kernel - Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 1/2] userns: Better restrictions on when proc and sysfs can be mounted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAE=NcrY+CzX+H4XQTdGj7CSZ98a5T=bNgT6=jGZzcjyaHb-ttw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:00:39 +0200
From:	Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@...il.com>
To:	Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 1/2] userns: Better restrictions on when proc and
 sysfs can be mounted

On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> And another question, it looks like if we don't have proc/sys fs mounted,
> then proc/sys will be failed to be mounted?

I have been wondering the same. Was quite some illogical surprise that
we have to be doing overlay mounts. This is the exact opposite from what
anyone would expect.


-- 
Janne
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/