linux-kernel - [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: Setting the host->mrq to NULL before executing tuning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1383634365.26153.100.camel@cliu38-desktop-build>
Date:	Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:52:45 +0800
From:	Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
To:	cjb@...top.org
Cc:	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	chuansheng.liu@...el.com, chuanxiao.dong@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: Setting the host->mrq to NULL before executing
 tuning


In function sdhci_request(), it is possible to do the tuning execution
like below:

sdhci_request() {
	spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
	host->mrq = mrq;
	...
	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);

<=== Here it is possible one pending finish_tasklet get running
     and it will operate the original mrq, and notified the mrq
     is done, and causes memory corruption.

	sdhci_execute_tuning(mmc, tuning_opcode);
	spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
	host->mrq = mrq;
...
}

In the above race place, the original mrq should not be finished wrongly,
so here before unlock the spinlock, we need to set the host->mrq to NULL
to avoid this case.

Signed-off-by: Liu, Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |    7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 7a7fb4f..c7a001a 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -1391,6 +1391,13 @@ static void sdhci_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
 					mmc->card->type == MMC_TYPE_MMC ?
 					MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200 :
 					MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK;
+
+				/* Here we need to set the host->mrq to NULL,
+				 * in case the penging finish_tasklet
+				 * operates it wrongly.
+				 */
+				host->mrq = NULL;
+
 				spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
 				sdhci_execute_tuning(mmc, tuning_opcode);
 				spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
-- 
1.7.9.5



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/