[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bo1zz4mu.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:31:21 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...g.com.ar>,
Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCHSET 00/14] perf report: Add support to accumulate hist periods (v2)
Hi Ingo,
On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:27:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> >> > 2)
>> >> >
>> >> > Is it possible to configure the default 'report -g' style, so that
>> >> > people who'd like to use it all the time don't have to type '-g
>> >> > cumulative' all the time?
>> >>
>> >> Hmm.. maybe I can add support for the 'report.call-graph' config option.
>> >
>> > If we display your new 'total' field by default then it's not as
>> > pressing to me :)
>>
>> Do you mean -g cumulative without 'self' column?
>
> So, if by default we display both 'self' and 'total' and sort by
> 'total', then I'm personally a happy camper: while it's a change of
> the default perf report output, it's also a step forward.
>
> But some people might complain about it once this hits v3.13 (or
> v3.14) and might want to hide individual columns and have different
> sorting preferences.
>
> So out of defensive caution you might want to provide toggles for
> such things, maybe even generalize it a bit to allow arbitrary
> hiding/display of individual colums in perf report.
>
> That would probably also make it easier to do minimal tweaks to the
> upstream reporting defaults.
Okay, so what would the interface look like?
I think it'd better to separate the option and pass column and
(optional) sort key argument.
--cumulative both,total (default)
--cumulative both,self
--cumulative total
--cumulative self (meaningless?)
Maybe we need a config option and a single letter option for the default
case like --call-graph and -g options do.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists