[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131105103237.GA23961@linux>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:32:37 +0200
From: Aldo Iljazi <mail@...o.io>
To: dsterba@...e.cz, chris.mason@...ionio.com,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FS: BTRFS: fixed coding style issues
David Sterba wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 03:27:38PM +0200, Aldo Iljazi wrote:
> > Fixed three coding style issues. Replaced spaces with tabs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aldo Iljazi <mail@...o.io>
> > ---
> > fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c b/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
> > index 9efb94e..b2fe609 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
> > @@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ int btrfs_dev_replace_start(struct btrfs_root *root,
> > printk_in_rcu(KERN_INFO
> > "btrfs: dev_replace from %s (devid %llu) to %s) started\n",
> > src_device->missing ? "<missing disk>" :
> > - rcu_str_deref(src_device->name),
> > + rcu_str_deref(src_device->name),
>
> What's the change here? I don't think we need to fix whitespace, this makes
> searching in patch history more tedious, namely in case where the code looks
> exactly the same before and after the patch.
>
> The style issues should be best fixed when the patch is about to be
> merged, doing it later like this is kind of not welcome, speaking for
> myself. There are lots of opportunities to do real code cleanups.
>
> Whitespace changes are just noise, we don't need them at this point of
> development phase of btrfs.
>
>
> david
I replaced the spaces with tabs, as the kernel coding style suggests.
--
Aldo Iljazi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists