lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 05 Nov 2013 07:08:31 -0800
From:	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC:	balbi@...com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] usb: gadget: add quirk_ep_out_aligned_size field
 to struct usb_gadget

On 11/05/2013 06:50 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, David Cohen wrote:
> 
>> Due to USB controllers may have different restrictions, usb gadget layer
>> needs to provide a generic way to inform gadget functions to complain
>> with non-standard requirements.
>>
>> This patch adds 'quirk_ep_out_aligned_size' field to struct usb_gadget
>> to inform when controller's epout requires buffer size to be aligned to
>> MaxPacketSize. A helper is also provided to align buffer size when
>> necessary.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/usb/gadget.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/usb/gadget.h b/include/linux/usb/gadget.h
>> index 23b3bfd0a842..260d972489bd 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/usb/gadget.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/usb/gadget.h
>> @@ -442,6 +442,22 @@ static inline void usb_ep_fifo_flush(struct usb_ep *ep)
>>  }
>>  
>>  
>> +static inline size_t usb_ep_align_maxpacketsize(struct usb_ep *ep, size_t len)
>> +{
>> +	int aligned;
>> +
>> +	if (ep->desc->bmAttributes & USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_INT)
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Interrupt eps don't need max packet size to be power of 2,
>> +		 * so can't use cheap IS_ALIGNED() macro.
>> +		 */
>> +		aligned = !(len % ep->desc->wMaxPacketSize);
>> +	else
>> +		aligned = IS_ALIGNED(len, ep->desc->wMaxPacketSize);
> 
> This isn't on a hot path, and I suspect that the extra "if" will 
> require nearly as much time as you save by not doing the division.  You 
> might as well always use the % operation.

Perhaps if I use unlikely() on 'if' condition instead?
Anyway I'll double check the costs of if + IS_ALIGNED vs modulo.

Br, David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ