linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] uprobes: move function declarations out of arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:01:50 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
	"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] uprobes: move function declarations out of
	arch

On 10/15, David Long wrote:
>
> Move the function declarations from the arch header to the common
> header, since only the function bodies are architecture-specific.
> These changes are from Vincent Rabin's uprobes patch.

Hmm. I didn't look at this patch because I thought it is obviously
fine, but...

>  arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h | 7 -------
>  include/linux/uprobes.h        | 8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

it should also update arch/powerpc/include/asm/uprobes.h ?

And 12/13 should not touch arch/powerpc/ or include/linux/uprobes.h.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/