| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1383670886-30827-5-git-send-email-eranian@google.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:01:26 +0100
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, ak@...ux.intel.com,
acme@...hat.com, jolsa@...hat.com, zheng.z.yan@...el.com,
bp@...en8.de, maria.n.dimakopoulou@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/4] perf,x86: add RAPL hrtimer support
The RAPL PMU counters do not interrupt on overflow.
Therefore, the kernel needs to poll the counters
to avoid missing an overflow. This patch adds
the hrtimer code to do this.
The timer internval is calculated at boot time
based on the power unit used by the HW.
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
index cf3559f..8963f69 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
@@ -92,11 +92,13 @@ static struct kobj_attribute format_attr_##_var = \
struct rapl_pmu {
spinlock_t lock;
- atomic_t refcnt;
int hw_unit; /* 1/2^hw_unit Joule */
- int phys_id;
- int n_active; /* number of active events */
+ struct hrtimer hrtimer;
struct list_head active_list;
+ ktime_t timer_interval; /* in ktime_t unit */
+ int n_active; /* number of active events */
+ int phys_id;
+ atomic_t refcnt;
};
static struct pmu rapl_pmu_class;
@@ -161,6 +163,47 @@ static u64 rapl_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
return new_raw_count;
}
+static void rapl_start_hrtimer(struct rapl_pmu *pmu)
+{
+ __hrtimer_start_range_ns(&pmu->hrtimer,
+ pmu->timer_interval, 0,
+ HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED, 0);
+}
+
+static void rapl_stop_hrtimer(struct rapl_pmu *pmu)
+{
+ hrtimer_cancel(&pmu->hrtimer);
+}
+
+static enum hrtimer_restart rapl_hrtimer_handle(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
+{
+ struct rapl_pmu *pmu = container_of(hrtimer, struct rapl_pmu, hrtimer);
+ struct perf_event *event;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!pmu->n_active)
+ return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(event, &pmu->active_list, active_entry) {
+ rapl_event_update(event);
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
+
+ hrtimer_forward_now(&pmu->hrtimer, pmu->timer_interval);
+
+ return HRTIMER_RESTART;
+}
+
+static void rapl_hrtimer_init(struct rapl_pmu *pmu)
+{
+ hrtimer_init(&pmu->hrtimer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
+ pmu->hrtimer.function = rapl_hrtimer_handle;
+}
+
+
static void __rapl_pmu_event_start(struct rapl_pmu *pmu,
struct perf_event *event)
{
@@ -174,6 +217,8 @@ static void __rapl_pmu_event_start(struct rapl_pmu *pmu,
local64_set(&event->hw.prev_count, rapl_read_counter(event));
pmu->n_active++;
+ if (pmu->n_active == 1)
+ rapl_start_hrtimer(pmu);
}
static void rapl_pmu_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
@@ -198,6 +243,8 @@ static void rapl_pmu_event_stop(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
if (!(hwc->state & PERF_HES_STOPPED)) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(pmu->n_active <= 0);
pmu->n_active--;
+ if (pmu->n_active == 0)
+ rapl_stop_hrtimer(pmu);
list_del(&event->active_entry);
@@ -443,6 +490,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_prepare(int cpu)
{
struct rapl_pmu *pmu = per_cpu(rapl_pmu, cpu);
int phys_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
+ u64 ms;
if (pmu)
return 0;
@@ -468,6 +516,20 @@ static int rapl_cpu_prepare(int cpu)
rdmsrl(MSR_RAPL_POWER_UNIT, pmu->hw_unit);
pmu->hw_unit = (pmu->hw_unit >> 8) & 0x1FULL;
+ /*
+ * use reference of 200W for scaling the timeout
+ * to avoid missing counter overflows.
+ * 200W = 200 Joules/sec
+ * divide interval by 2 to avoid lockstep (2 * 100)
+ * if hw unit is 32, then we use 2 ms 1/200/2
+ */
+ if (pmu->hw_unit < 32)
+ ms = 1000 * (1ULL << (32 - pmu->hw_unit - 1)) / (2 * 100);
+ else
+ ms = 2;
+
+ pmu->timer_interval = ms_to_ktime(ms);
+
/* set RAPL pmu for this cpu for now */
per_cpu(rapl_pmu_kfree, cpu) = NULL;
per_cpu(rapl_pmu, cpu) = pmu;
@@ -629,6 +691,7 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
}
rapl_cpu_prepare(cpu);
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &rapl_cpu_mask);
+ rapl_hrtimer_init(per_cpu(rapl_pmu, cpu));
}
perf_cpu_notifier(rapl_cpu_notifier);
@@ -644,9 +707,11 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
pr_info("RAPL PMU detected, hw unit 2^-%d Joules,"
" API unit is 2^-32 Joules,"
- " %d fixed counters\n",
+ " %d fixed counters"
+ " %llu ms ovfl timer\n",
pmu->hw_unit,
- hweight32(rapl_cntr_mask));
+ hweight32(rapl_cntr_mask),
+ ktime_to_ms(pmu->timer_interval));
put_online_cpus();
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists