lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131105173152.GB7329@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Tue, 5 Nov 2013 14:31:52 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 06/11] perf record: Add an option to force per-cpu
 mmaps

PeterZ,

	Can I have your Acked-by for this one? I guess now the goal is
achieved, no?

- Arnaldo

Em Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:25:45AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 02:30:24PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 03:09:30PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > > > right, I haven't considered the hundreds CPU machine.. I just
> > > > saw that it disables inherited events in my test ;-) maybe we
> > > > could mentioned that somewhere, because it's not clear
> > > 
> > > How about this:
> > > 
> > > From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> > > 
> > > By default, when tasks are specified (i.e. -p, -t
> > > or -u options) per-thread mmaps are created.  Add
> > > an option to override that and force per-cpu mmaps.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> > 
> > seems ok, thanks
> 
> Much better, but may I ask that the explanation in the man pages be
> present in the changeset commit as well? So that by just looking at 'git
> log' we can more readily get the whole picture, i.e. scalability versus
> wanting to have inherit.
> 
> - Arnaldo
>  
> > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> > 
> > jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ