linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/13] tracing/uprobes: Add more fetch functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87eh6v1tfe.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date:	Tue, 05 Nov 2013 11:19:49 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Hyeoncheol Lee <cheol.lee@....com>,
	Hemant Kumar <hkshaw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"zhangwei\(Jovi\)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] tracing/uprobes: Add more fetch functions

Hi Steve,

On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:17:06 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 17:44:31 +0100
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/04, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:22:18 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> > > On 10/29, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> +static void __user *get_user_vaddr(unsigned long addr, struct trace_uprobe *tu)
>> > >> +{
>> > >> +	unsigned long pgoff = addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> > >> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>> > >> +	struct address_space *mapping;
>> > >> +	unsigned long vaddr = 0;
>> > >> +
>> > >> +	if (tu == NULL) {
>> > >> +		/* A NULL tu means that we already got the vaddr */
>> > >> +		return (void __force __user *) addr;
>> > >> +	}
>> > >> +
>> > >> +	mapping = tu->inode->i_mapping;
>> > >> +
>> > >> +	mutex_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
>> > >> +	vma_interval_tree_foreach(vma, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff, pgoff) {
>> > >> +		if (vma->vm_mm != current->mm)
>> > >> +			continue;
>> > >> +		if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_READ))
>> > >> +			continue;
>> > >> +
>> > >> +		vaddr = offset_to_vaddr(vma, addr);
>> > >> +		break;
>> > >> +	}
>> > >> +	mutex_unlock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
>> > >> +
>> > >> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(vaddr == 0);
>> > >
>> > > Hmm. But unless I missed something this "addr" passed as an argument can
>> > > be wrong? And if nothing else this or another thread can unmap the vma?
>> >
>> > You mean WARN_ON_ONCE here is superfluous?  I admit that it should
>> > protect concurrent vma [un]mappings.  Please see my reply in other
>> > thread for a new approach.
>> 
>> Whatever we do this address can be unmapped. For example, just because of
>> @invalid_address passed to trace_uprobe.c.
>> 
>> We do not really care, copy_from_user() should fail. But we should not
>> WARN() in this case.
>> 
>
> I agree, the WARN_ON_ONCE() above looks like it's uncalled for.
> WARN()ings should only be used when an anomaly in the kernel logic is
> detected. Can this trigger on bad input from user space, or something
> else that userspace does? (a race with unmapping memory?). If so, error
> out to the user process, but do not call any of the WARN() functions.

Will do.  Thanks for the explanation.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/