[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131105215243.GA8303@sdfg.com.ar>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:52:43 +0000
From: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...g.com.ar>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] perf hists: Consolidate __hists__add_*entry()
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:09:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> @@ -486,15 +425,15 @@ struct hist_entry *__hists__add_entry(struct hists *hists,
> .ip = al->addr,
> .level = al->level,
> .stat = {
> - .period = period,
> .nr_events = 1,
> + .period = period,
> .weight = weight,
> },
Isn't this seems unrelated and unneeded ?
The "period" field is before the "nr_events" field in the struct, so maybe is
more clear to leave it as it was ? The actual relative order (it has some more
fields) in the struct is: period, weigth, nr_events. Might be better if they
match that order here ? Although not sure since we are using the fields with
name and is clear enough.
Thanks a lot,
Rodrigo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists