[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <527862B9.2060300@hitachi.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:15:05 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
x86@...nel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v2 3/3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Prohibit probing on func_ptr_is_kernel_text
(2013/11/05 11:00), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 11:25:37 +0000
> Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
>
>> Prohibit probing on func_ptr_is_kernel_text().
>> Since the func_ptr_is_kernel_text() is called from
>> notifier_call_chain() which is called from int3 handler,
>> probing it may cause double int3 fault and kernel will
>> reboot.
>>
>> This happenes when the kernel built with CONFIG_DEBUG_NOTIFIERS=y.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> kernel/extable.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/extable.c b/kernel/extable.c
>> index 832cb28..022fb25 100644
>> --- a/kernel/extable.c
>> +++ b/kernel/extable.c
>> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ int kernel_text_address(unsigned long addr)
>> * pointer is part of the kernel text, we need to do some
>> * special dereferencing first.
>> */
>> -int func_ptr_is_kernel_text(void *ptr)
>> +int nokprobe func_ptr_is_kernel_text(void *ptr)
>> {
>> unsigned long addr;
>> addr = (unsigned long) dereference_function_descriptor(ptr);
>>
>
> One thing I worry about the "nokprobe" annotation, is that it moves the
> location of the function out of local. This function no exists in
> the section with its users. Same with the debug functions in the
> other patch.
>
> Now these may be a slow path where we really don't care, but if the
> nokprobe expands this can cause issues.
>
> The "nokprobe" works differently than "notrace" as "notrace" is just an
> attribute that tells gcc not to add mcount to it. The "nokprobe"
> actually moves the function into a different section.
Well, in that case, I can put it in the opt-out type blacklist(kprobe_blacklist). :)
Hmm, I think if I can list nokprobe functions up at build time, we can almost
remove the .kprobes.text (Note that some of entry functions in asm still require it.)
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists