[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52788606.5070002@asianux.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:45:42 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: Chen Gang F T <chen.gang.flying.transformer@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] get_maintainer: Improve "Author:" rolestats
On 11/05/2013 01:42 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 11/05/2013 01:23 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 10:37 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> But after I let it pure next-20131101 ("git reset HEAD^; git stash"), it
>>> still cause this issue.
>>
>> It's also because:
>>
>>>>> Also, there's a defect in function vcs_find_signers.
>>>>> It should only return the commit count and array references.
>>>>>
>>>>> If there are no signers in the commit history interval specified,
>>>>> then the "authors" array is added to the "signers" array and
>>>>> returned as a single array.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> OK, thanks. Do you mean: in pure next-20131101 contents an author which
> commit a patch, but not signed himself? (if so, it seems the related
> patch need be re-committed again by the related author).
>
If really as what I guess above (some patches no Signed-of-by), is there
a tool to check and find this issue in time?
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists