[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131106085859.GB9487@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 00:58:59 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, tj@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devres: Freeing the drs after all release() are called
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:40:18PM +0800, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
>
> In release_nodes(), it will call dr->node.release() and kfree
> dr one by one.
>
> But sometimes the previous dr maybe be used by next .release(),
> such as:
> [50314.855534] [<c12b172f>] ? synchronize_irq+0x3f/0xb0
> [50314.861193] [<c12b18e9>] __free_irq+0x149/0x200
> [50314.866367] [<c12b19e3>] free_irq+0x43/0xa0
> [50314.871152] [<c12b4864>] devm_irq_release+0x14/0x20
> [50314.876713] [<c169e806>] release_nodes+0x136/0x1b0
> [50314.882178] [<c169ee79>] devres_release_all+0x39/0x60
> [50314.887935] [<c169b411>] __device_release_driver+0x71/0xd0
>
> the free_irq() will sync the last irq handling, which maybe use
> freed dr, then it will cause memory corruption.
>
> Here split the dr kfreeing actions after all dr->node.release().
But you aren't really solving any problems here, how is dr being used
after the release function is called? Who is doing it in such a way
that this change would really fix anything?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists