linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] gpio: davinci: Fixed a check for unbanked gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:56:24 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Alex Elder <alex.elder@...aro.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com" 
	<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] gpio: davinci: Fixed a check for unbanked gpio

On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Prabhakar Lad
<prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Lad, Prabhakar
>> <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
>>>
>>> This patch fixes the check for the offset in
>>> gpio_to_irq_unbanked() function.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
>>
>> Is this a regression that should go in right now?
>>
> Yes it needs too.

But on top of *what* exactly?

This does not apply to my gpio tree devel branch and
not even on the mainline kernel.

Is this something that should go on top of the davinci
GPIO patch set that is still being elaborated on?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/