[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <527A2B37.4040308@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 17:12:47 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com"
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Alex Elder <alex.elder@...aro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] gpio: davinci: Fixed a check for unbanked gpio
Hi Grygorii,
On Wednesday 06 November 2013 05:03 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi Sekhar, Linus,
>
> On 11/06/2013 12:49 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Wednesday 06 November 2013 03:45 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>>> Hi Linus,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Linus Walleij
>>> <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Prabhakar Lad
>>>> <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Linus Walleij
>>>>> <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Lad, Prabhakar
>>>>>> <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch fixes the check for the offset in
>>>>>>> gpio_to_irq_unbanked() function.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this a regression that should go in right now?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes it needs too.
>>>>
>>>> But on top of *what* exactly?
>>>>
>>>> This does not apply to my gpio tree devel branch and
>>>> not even on the mainline kernel.
>>>>
>>> Looks like this needs to go via ARM tree as the earlier
>>> patches have gone via ARM tree itself [1].
>>> If you can ACK it Sekhar can get it in via ARM tree.
>>
>> The dependent patches are all in linux-next through ARM SoC queued for
>> v3.13 merge. This fix can either be sent late in merge cycle once Linus
>> has pulled ARM SoC or after v3.13-rc1 comes out.
>
> Pls, wait a bit - this fix is incomplete :( The below changes have to be
> done too:
Can either you or Prabhakar send a separate patch (series) with only the
fixes?
Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists