linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCHSET 00/14] perf report: Add support to accumulate hist periods (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Nov 2013 13:10:40 +0100
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...g.com.ar>,
	Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCHSET 00/14] perf report: Add support to accumulate hist
 periods (v2)

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 09:30:46AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Ingo,
> > 
> > On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:58:02 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >> But the 'cumulative' (btw, I feel a bit hard to type this word..) is 
> > >> different in that it *generates* entries didn't get sampled originally. 
> > >> And as it requires callchains, total field will not work if callchains 
> > >> are missing.
> > >
> > > Well, 'total' should disappear if it's not available.
> > 
> > But what if it's the only sort key user gave?
> 
> Do you mean something like:
> 
>   -F self,name -s total
> 
> i.e. if a sort key not displayed?
> 
> I think sort keys should be automatically added to the displayed fields 
> list.
> 
> This rule is obviously met with the -F total:2,self:1,name:0 kind of 
> sorting syntax (you can only sort by fields that get displayed) - if mixed 
> with -s then it should be implicit I think.

I'm not sure why you want to add a new -F that adds news way to display fields.
Isn't -s enough for that?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/