linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH v5 01/14] sched: add a new arch_sd_local_flags for sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:53:44 +0100
From:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
	"cmetcalf@...era.com" <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
	"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
	james.hogan@...tec.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v5 01/14] sched: add a new arch_sd_local_flags for
 sched_domain init

On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 23:27:52 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 03:57:23PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Your proposal looks fine for me. It's clearly better to move in one
> > place the configuration of sched_domain fields. Have you already got
> > an idea about how to let architecture override the topology?
> 
> Maybe something like the below -- completely untested (my s390 compiler
> is on a machine that's currently powered off).

In principle I do not see a reason why this should not work, but there
are a few more things to take care of. E.g. struct sd_data is defined
in kernel/sched/core.c, cpu_cpu_mask as well. These need to be moved
to a header where arch/s390/kernel/smp.c can pick it up.

I do have the feeling that the sched_domain_topology should be left
where they are, or do we really want to expose more of the scheduler
internals?

> > My primary need comes from the fact that the topology configuration is
> > not the same for all cores
> 
> Do expand.. the various cpu masks used in the topology list are per cpu,
> is that sufficient room to wriggle or do you need more?
> 
> ---
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -1070,3 +1070,23 @@ static int __init s390_smp_init(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  subsys_initcall(s390_smp_init);
> +
> +static struct sched_domain_topology_level s390_topology[] = {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> +	{ cpu_smt_mask, SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER | SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES },
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
> +	{ cpu_coregroup_mask, SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES },
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_BOOK
> +	{ cpu_book_mask, },
> +#endif
> +	{ cpu_cpu_mask, },
> +	{ NULL, },
> +};
> +
> +static int __init s390_sched_topology(void)
> +{
> +	sched_domain_topology = s390_topology;
> +}
> +early_initcall(s390_sched_topology);
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -889,6 +889,20 @@ void free_sched_domains(cpumask_var_t do
> 
>  bool cpus_share_cache(int this_cpu, int that_cpu);
> 
> +typedef const struct cpumask *(*sched_domain_mask_f)(int cpu);
> +
> +#define SDTL_OVERLAP	0x01
> +
> +struct sched_domain_topology_level {
> +	sched_domain_mask_f mask;
> +	int		    sd_flags;
> +	int		    flags;
> +	int		    numa_level;
> +	struct sd_data      data;
> +};
> +
> +extern struct sched_domain_topology_level *sched_domain_topology;
> +
>  #else /* CONFIG_SMP */
> 
>  struct sched_domain_attr;
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -5377,20 +5377,6 @@ enum s_alloc {
>  	sa_none,
>  };
> 
> -struct sched_domain_topology_level;
> -
> -typedef const struct cpumask *(*sched_domain_mask_f)(int cpu);
> -
> -#define SDTL_OVERLAP	0x01
> -
> -struct sched_domain_topology_level {
> -	sched_domain_mask_f mask;
> -	int		    sd_flags;
> -	int		    flags;
> -	int		    numa_level;
> -	struct sd_data      data;
> -};
> -
>  /*
>   * Build an iteration mask that can exclude certain CPUs from the upwards
>   * domain traversal.
> @@ -5841,6 +5827,7 @@ sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_lev
> 
>  	return sd;
>  }
> +
>  /*
>   * Topology list, bottom-up.
>   */
> @@ -5851,14 +5838,11 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_leve
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
>  	{ cpu_coregroup_mask, SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES },
>  #endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_BOOK
> -	{ cpu_book_mask, },
> -#endif
>  	{ cpu_cpu_mask, },
>  	{ NULL, },
>  };
> 
> -static struct sched_domain_topology_level *sched_domain_topology = default_topology;
> +struct sched_domain_topology_level *sched_domain_topology = default_topology;
> 
>  #define for_each_sd_topology(tl)			\
>  	for (tl = sched_domain_topology; tl->mask; tl++)
> 


-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/