[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131106153429.GA26336@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:34:29 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sebastien.dugue@...l.net,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86: add prefetching to do_csum
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:23:19AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> do_csum was identified via perf recently as a hot spot when doing
> receive on ip over infiniband workloads. After alot of testing and
> ideas, we found the best optimization available to us currently is to
> prefetch the entire data buffer prior to doing the checksum
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
> index 9845371..9f2d3ee 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
> @@ -29,8 +29,15 @@ static inline unsigned short from32to16(unsigned a)
> * Things tried and found to not make it faster:
> * Manual Prefetching
> * Unrolling to an 128 bytes inner loop.
> - * Using interleaving with more registers to break the carry chains.
Did you mean perhaps to remove the "Manual Prefetching" line instead ?
(Curious, what was tried before that made it not worthwhile?)
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists