linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] arm64: introduce aarch64_insn_gen_{nop|branch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:31:55 +0800
From:	Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@...aro.org>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] arm64: introduce aarch64_insn_gen_{nop|branch_imm}()
 helper functions

On 10/30/2013 08:48 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 04:19:58PM +0100, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
>>
>> Introduce aarch64_insn_gen_{nop|branch_imm}() helper functions, which
>> will be used to implement jump label on ARM64.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
>> Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c      | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
>> index 8f94e48..ee4a60d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
>> @@ -96,9 +96,22 @@ static __always_inline void aarch64_insn_write(void *addr, u32 insn)
>>  	*(u32 *)addr = cpu_to_le32(insn);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static __always_inline u32 aarch64_insn_gen_hint(enum aarch64_insn_hint_op op)
>> +{
>> +	return aarch64_insn_get_hint_value() | op;
> 
> What's the point in that helper function? Does it just return an immediate
> value (and are there are other users of it?).
It just returns a const value. The helper function is just for ease
maintainence.

> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +static __always_inline u32 aarch64_insn_gen_nop(void)
>> +{
>> +	return aarch64_insn_gen_hint(AARCH64_INSN_HINT_NOP);
>> +}
> 
> Either use plain old `inline' or write these as preprocessor macros.
Will change to normal (non-inline) and add __kprobe property.

> 
>> +
>>  enum aarch64_insn_encoding_class aarch64_get_insn_class(u32 insn);
>>  u32 aarch64_insn_encode_immediate(enum aarch64_insn_imm_type type,
>>  				  u32 insn, u64 imm);
>> +u32 aarch64_insn_gen_branch_imm(unsigned long pc, unsigned long addr,
>> +				bool link);
>> +
>>  bool aarch64_insn_hotpatch_safe(u32 old_insn, u32 new_insn);
>>  
>>  int aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(void *addr, u32 insn);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
>> index 886821f..f7498cc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>>   * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>>   * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>>   */
>> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>>  #include <linux/compiler.h>
>>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>  #include <linux/smp.h>
>> @@ -233,3 +234,30 @@ u32 aarch64_insn_encode_immediate(enum aarch64_insn_imm_type type,
>>  
>>  	return insn;
>>  }
>> +
>> +u32 aarch64_insn_gen_branch_imm(unsigned long pc, unsigned long addr, bool link)
>> +{
>> +	u32 insn;
>> +	long offset;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * PC: A 64-bit Program Counter holding the address of the current
>> +	 * instruction. A64 instructions may be word-aligned.
>> +	 */
>> +	BUG_ON((pc & 0x3) || (addr & 0x3));
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * B/BL support [-128M, 128M) offset
>> +	 * ARM64 virtual address arrangement garantees all kernel and module
> 
> Typo: `guarantees'.
Thanks, will fix it.

> 
>> +	 * texts are within +/-128M.
>> +	 */
>> +	offset = ((long)addr - (long)pc) >> 2;
>> +	BUG_ON(abs(offset) > BIT(25) || offset == BIT(25));
> 
> I really struggle to follow this range checking. Why don't you just compare
> the absolute difference between addr and pc with SZ_128M?
Will change code to follow your suggestion.

> 
> Will
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/