[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131106115800.05164696@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 11:58:00 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, lkp@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace, sched: Add TRACE_FLAG_PREEMPT_RESCHED
On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 17:45:25 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:37:04AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> This also wasn't the last version of the patch, I distinctly remember
> you making me update some documentation crap.
Hmm, the later patches must be lost in my INBOX, which I'm currently
trying to get back under control.
> > Simply because I find switch statements easier to read than else if
> > statements.
>
> Sure whatever your code ;-), but says he who wrote:
>
> hardsoft_irq =
> (hardirq && softirq) ? 'H' :
> hardirq ? 'h' :
> softirq ? 's' :
> '.';
Hehe, I like that better that else if too :-)
>
> Just apply the later patch and change it however you like.
Sure, but it still needs to go in with the sched code, as its dependent
on new functions that I don't have.
Just add my Acked-by: and I'll clean it up in 3.13.
Thanks!
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists